next up previous
Next: Acknowledgements Up: Parallel Simulation of Previous: Conclusion

Related Work

Three approaches to collective I/O are discussed in [Kot94]: traditional caching, two-phase I/O, and disk-directed I/O. Traditional caching does no collective I/O optimizations, since I/O requests are served as they arrive. These three methods were implemented and compared using the STARFISH [Kot96] simulator, which is based on Proteus [BDCW91], a parallel architecture simulation engine.

Panda [SCJ95] provides a high-level collective I/O library interface. It implements server-directed I/O, which is disk-directed I/O at the logical file level, rather than the physical disk level. This method provides a high-level of portability by avoiding the difficult details of utilizing specific attributes for each underlying filesystem. Unfortunately, it may not produce as much performance as a true implementation of disk-directed I/O might. Also, Panda provides its own API to access its libraries. This may not be desirable since it is non-standard, which is one of the reasons why something such as MPI-IO has been proposed.



next up previous
Next: Acknowledgements Up: Parallel Simulation of Previous: Conclusion



Andy Kahn
Tue Jun 24 17:48:10 PDT 1997